Currently a month behind as Landon has not had time to work on March financials yet.
The net revenue currently is at $294,000. February was a good month for donations as
the CCLT received $100,000 in restricted donations. Current cash in the bank is
$434,000.
Motion to accept the treasurer’s report:Staton
Motion to 2nd: Head
Not Voting: LaBrunerie, Ascani
Motion passed: 7:0
Administrative Services
The document attached is the itemized list of staff activities for the Land Trust. Stanton
asked staff about the contract for administrative services and why he signed off on having
the money drawn at the beginning of the year instead of at the end like we have done in
the past. Amelunke let him know that we have been doing it incorrectly in the past
according to their agreement. The way its stated in the agreement is that staff is suppose
to draw all of it at once at the beginning. Stanton asked if there would be a way to carry
over the surplus if there is any at the end of the year and was told there would. Trotter
asked if the administrative service attachment could be uploaded as a excel sheet
instead of a PDF file. They been using Gemini and Notebook Outlander to help analyze
the document and the PDF format has not been playing nice with Gemini. Staff let him
know that we could possibly look into making the excel doc into a google sheet.
VII. OLD BUSINESS
Review Conflict of Interest Policy
Hunt’s view of the conflict of interest policy is that we need to be on alert for is the term
interested person as its pretty broad. One reason for steering clear of discussions ahead
of time is that it may lead you into a personal relationship with someone and then having
to vote on it later on because you had a discussion on it. This doesn’t mean you can’t
talk with someone about what you have learned/seen but you are responsible for making
the board aware of the connection and then voluntary recuse yourself or give the board
the option to vote on recusing them. Stanton wants the board member to have the option
to recuse themselves if they feel like they need to. Carroll likes the prompt of having
everyone discuss openly what their experience was for each case but from experience,
the ex parte statement and recusal were often confused. A conflict of interest and
conversation are not the same thing as you should know the community and be able to
have conversations. The Land Trust’s current conflict of interest policy is more strict than
other boards and council, which Carroll liked. Stanton stated that anytime the board goes
into closed session or have a discussion where a conflict could appear, we need to make
a statement and put all the information out on the table. Stanton trust everyone on the
board judgement and to advocate for self-recusal. Amelunke doesn’t think the person
would need to leave the room for the discussion after the board been aware of the conflict.
The person just would not be able to vote on the perceived case. This is different than
other boards and council as they do leave the room once the conflict has been made
aware of. Hunt made the comment that our current policy only stated the person have to