City of Columbia, Missouri  
Meeting Minutes - Final  
Community Land Trust Organization Board  
City Hall Conference  
Room 1A/1B, 701 E  
Broadway  
Wednesday, April 1, 2026  
Regular Meeting  
6:30 PM  
I. CALL TO ORDER  
The meeting was called to order at 6:32 pm by Stanton.  
II. INTRODUCTIONS  
Present at the start of the meeting were board members Anthony Stanton, Linda Head,  
Jaye Trotter, Douglas Hunt, Sabra Mitchell and Valerie Carroll. City staff members Jacob  
Amelunke, and Kevin Gorsage were also in attendance.  
7 -  
Present:  
Anthony Stanton, Linda Head, Jeremy Trotter, Tracey Bush-Cook, Douglas Hunt,  
Sabra Mitchell and Diamond Tabron  
2 - Alexander LaBrunerie and Rikki Ascani  
Excused:  
1 - Valerie Carroll  
Non-Voting:  
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA  
Motion to approve the agenda: Stanton  
Motion to 2nd: Head  
Not Voting: LaBrunerie, Ascani, Bush-Cook, Tabron  
Motion passed: 5:0  
IV. APPROVAL OF MINUTES  
Approval of February 4, 2026 Meeting Minutes  
Diamond Tabron arrived at 6:34pm.  
Motion to approve February 4, 2026 meeting minutes: Stanton  
Motion to 2nd: Trotter  
Not Voting: LaBrunerie, Ascani, Bush-Cook, Tabron  
Motion passed: 5:0  
V. MOTION TO GO INTO CLOSED SESSION  
Motion to go into closed session pursuant to RSMO 610.021 (2) Leasing  
purchase or sale of real estate by a public governmental body where public  
knowledge of the transaction might adversely affect the legal consideration  
therefor.  
Meeting went into closed session at 6:34pm  
Tracey Bush-Cook arrived at 6:45pm.  
Motion to go into closed session pursuant to RSMo 610.021 (2) Leasing, purchase  
or sale of real estate by a public governmental body where public knowledge of  
the transaction might adversely affect the legal consideration therefor: Hunt  
Motion to 2nd: Trotter  
Roll Call Vote:  
Anthony Stanton: Yes  
Linda Head: Yes  
Jaye Trotter: Yes  
Sabra Mitchell: Yes  
Diamond Tabron: Yes  
Douglas Hunt: Yes  
Not Voting: LaBrunerie, Ascani, Bush-Cook  
Motion passed: 6:0  
6 - Stanton, Head, Trotter, Hunt, Mitchell and Tabron  
3 - LaBrunerie, Bush-Cook and Ascani  
1 - Carroll  
Yes:  
Excused:  
Non-Voting:  
Tracey Bush-Cook stepped out at 7:29pm.  
Tracey Bush-Cook returned to the meeting at 7:33pm.  
Meeting came out of closed session at 7:46pm.  
Motion to come out of closed session pursuant to RSMo 610.021 (2) Leasing,  
purchase or sale of real estate by a public governmental body where public  
knowledge of the transaction might adversely affect the legal consideration  
therefor: Hunt  
Motion to 2nd: Stanton  
Roll Call Vote:  
Anthony Stanton: Yes  
Linda Head: Yes  
Jaye Trotter: Yes  
Sabra Mitchell: Yes  
Diamond Tabron: Yes  
Douglas Hunt: Yes  
Tracey Bush-Cook: Yes  
Not Voting: LaBrunerie, Ascani  
Motion passed: 7:0  
7 - Stanton, Head, Trotter, Bush-Cook, Hunt, Mitchell and Tabron  
Yes:  
Excused:  
2 - LaBrunerie and Ascani  
1 - Carroll  
Non-Voting:  
VI. REPORTS  
Treasurer's Report  
Currently a month behind as Landon has not had time to work on March financials yet.  
The net revenue currently is at $294,000. February was a good month for donations as  
the CCLT received $100,000 in restricted donations. Current cash in the bank is  
$434,000.  
Motion to accept the treasurer’s report:Staton  
Motion to 2nd: Head  
Not Voting: LaBrunerie, Ascani  
Motion passed: 7:0  
Administrative Services  
The document attached is the itemized list of staff activities for the Land Trust. Stanton  
asked staff about the contract for administrative services and why he signed off on having  
the money drawn at the beginning of the year instead of at the end like we have done in  
the past. Amelunke let him know that we have been doing it incorrectly in the past  
according to their agreement. The way its stated in the agreement is that staff is suppose  
to draw all of it at once at the beginning. Stanton asked if there would be a way to carry  
over the surplus if there is any at the end of the year and was told there would. Trotter  
asked if the administrative service attachment could be uploaded as a excel sheet  
instead of a PDF file. They been using Gemini and Notebook Outlander to help analyze  
the document and the PDF format has not been playing nice with Gemini. Staff let him  
know that we could possibly look into making the excel doc into a google sheet.  
VII. OLD BUSINESS  
Review Conflict of Interest Policy  
Hunt’s view of the conflict of interest policy is that we need to be on alert for is the term  
interested person as its pretty broad. One reason for steering clear of discussions ahead  
of time is that it may lead you into a personal relationship with someone and then having  
to vote on it later on because you had a discussion on it. This doesn’t mean you can’t  
talk with someone about what you have learned/seen but you are responsible for making  
the board aware of the connection and then voluntary recuse yourself or give the board  
the option to vote on recusing them. Stanton wants the board member to have the option  
to recuse themselves if they feel like they need to. Carroll likes the prompt of having  
everyone discuss openly what their experience was for each case but from experience,  
the ex parte statement and recusal were often confused. A conflict of interest and  
conversation are not the same thing as you should know the community and be able to  
have conversations. The Land Trust’s current conflict of interest policy is more strict than  
other boards and council, which Carroll liked. Stanton stated that anytime the board goes  
into closed session or have a discussion where a conflict could appear, we need to make  
a statement and put all the information out on the table. Stanton trust everyone on the  
board judgement and to advocate for self-recusal. Amelunke doesn’t think the person  
would need to leave the room for the discussion after the board been aware of the conflict.  
The person just would not be able to vote on the perceived case. This is different than  
other boards and council as they do leave the room once the conflict has been made  
aware of. Hunt made the comment that our current policy only stated the person have to  
recuse themselves for the vote and not the discussion. Carroll suggest adding the word  
discussion to section 5 under the voluntary recusal so it is consistent with section 6. This  
would cover in case something comes up in the middle of the discussion and you have to  
recuse yourself then. Stanton wants to revisit section 5 and discuss wording in the next  
meeting.  
Marketing  
The only thing Stanton had for marking is to start using the website a little bit stronger,  
per discussion with Geoff Jones. Stanton wants to table the marketing discussion until  
next meeting so he can speak with Ms. Ascani in the meantime  
VIII. NEW BUSINESS  
COMO Gives Procedure  
Right now, there not much to do besides learning about it. COMO Gives is an annual  
fundraiser that is held in December. It is set up as a competition with local non-for-profits  
to compete to see how much money they can raise. We would have to register in June  
and depending on how much we fundraiser, there could be additional grants given. This  
could be used as a good starting platform for small dollar donations in addition to our  
large dollar donations that Hunt been working on. Trotter wants to do some more looking  
into this and discuss more at the next meeting.  
IX. GENERAL COMMENTS BY PUBLIC, MEMBERS AND STAFF  
No comment from the public or staff.  
Mitchell noticed from the last meeting minutes, her and Trotter were supposed to follow  
up on the mailboxes but they have not had the chance to due to personal reasons. They  
will return to the meeting next month with an update. Hunt gave an update as he been  
invited by the Benton-Stephen Neighborhood Association to come talk about Land Trust  
matters. He been approached now by 4 people who want to donation their homes. He  
suggests having a discussion on how to handle the different situations that may come up  
and to look at the land donation policy for those situations. Stanton wants to talk about  
operating costs at the next meeting.  
X. NEXT MEETING DATE  
May 6, 2026  
XI. ADJOURNMENT  
The meeting adjourned at 8:26pm.  
Motion to adjourn: Stanton  
Motion to 2nd: Head  
Not Voting: LaBrunerie, Ascani  
Motion passed: 7:0