crime, and litter, and suggested the community only provide resources to those from
Columbia or Boone County, enforce existing ordinances, provide real data for outcomes
from money spent on homeless-related services, focus on mental illness and substance
use, consider supported employment, and shift support and resources to public safety,
families at high-risk, and high-risk youth as she felt enabling the homeless was not the
best action.
SPC9-25
Jacque Sample - Discussion of the Texas vs. Becerra lawsuit and the
potential impact on Columbia.
Jacque Sample, a Third Ward resident, provided a handout and explained that although
the Texas vs Becerra case was on pause, it was still an active threat because it had not
ended and Missouri had not pulled out of the case, and asked the Council to speak out in
support of its citizens and students that relied on Section 504 services by asking
Missouri Attorney General Andrew Bailey to pull out of the lawsuit.
SPC10-25
Chriss Jones - The lack of transparency at City Hall.
Chriss Jones,
a
representative of Hold CoMo Accountable, stated the lack of
transparency was one of the biggest reasons for the lack of trust by community members
and provided the lack of meeting minutes being available to the public, the lack of
measures and goals for meeting and surpassing regulatory requirements, pre-council
meetings not being recorded, and not allowing virtual participation for council meetings as
examples of that lack of transparency, and asked that the Council to suggest ways for
the City to become more transparent.
V. PUBLIC HEARINGS
PH7-25
Proposed installation of traffic calming devices on Rollins Road between
Fairview Road and Stadium Boulevard.
The public hearing was read by the City Clerk.
Public Works Director Shane Creech provided a staff report, and he and Engineering and
Operations Manager Richard Stone responded to Council questions and comments.
Mayor Buffaloe opened the public hearing.
Jim Loveless, 2404 Topaz Drive, explained those on foot or on a bicycle could not see a
car coming from Stadium Boulevard until it was at the crest of the hill, and believed this
plan would effectively slow traffic so that those trying to cross Rollins Road near that
location could do so safely.
Alison Kaiser, 805 Hulen Drive, commented that she had benefited from the speed bumps
on Hulen Drive, agreed with the plans for Rollins Road, and suggested the advisory sign
that said 20 mph due to a turn ahead near the Eastlake Drive intersection be moved
further west so people would see it as she felt it was currently too far away.
Pat O’Gorman, who resided at the corner of Hulen Drive and Rollins Road, indicated his
opposition to this project as he did not feel there was an issue, asked for the average
speeds along with the location of those readings, believed they needed to ensure bushes,
trees, and fences were where they should be, and felt speed bumps were hard on
vehicles and would cause problems in bad weather since the roadway was already hilly.
Chriss Jones, a Second Ward resident, stated she went through speed tables on a daily
basis at the appropriate speed, and speed tables were not hard on her car.
Sarah Smith, 908 Martin Drive, provided a handout, indicated she has never felt unsafe on
Rollins Road, even when walking with her children back and forth to Fairview Elementary,
and believed three traffic calming devices within a few hundred feet of each other near the
intersection of Martin Drive and Rollins Road was too much.
Colin Burgess, 806 Martin Drive, asked that the pinches at Martin Drive and Rollins Road
not be installed as the roadway was already narrow for those traveling westbound,
suggested the installation of street lights to improve the visibility at the crosswalk, felt the
worst part of the roadway was toward the far right side of the section shown on the
second map from the top, and suggested speed bumps on both sides of that curve versus
at the locations proposed because cross traffic could not be seen there.