environments, commented that
a
managed feeding and TNR approach kept cats
healthier, stabilized populations, and reduced the pressure on local wildlife, suggested a
clear, enforceable TNR ordinance, which required any cat regularly fed to be neutered,
tipped, and vaccinated for rabies, instead of a permit, noted rescues, shelter, and neuter
clinics already tracked TNR surgeries, providing more accurate data than the voluntary
permit system, stated that when colonies were properly managed through TNR,
complaints decreased as cats fought less, roamed less, and stopped reproducing,
stabilizing the numbers, reiterated her request to replace the permit requirement with a
TRN ordinance that prioritized sterilization, accountability, and practical enforcement
while also adding wording to safeguard rescues, shelters and independent trappers as
that would protect the City, support Animal Control, and assist the rescues and
volunteers who were already doing the work, and provided a handout.
Janeene Johnston, 1408 St. Andrew Street, expressed appreciation for staff for their work
on this along with their willingness to listen to those who were passionate about TNR
work whereby they trapped, neutered, spayed, vaccinated, and returned the cats to the
area where they were trapped, explained those involved were passionate and funded this
themselves with the assistance of rescues and TNR groups, noted the care of an injured
animal was also the responsibility of the TNR caretaker, stated many chose not to obtain
permits because they did not want their name, address, or the location of the cats
available to the public as it could put the cats at risk of harm or the TNR caretaker
receiving comments or threats, thanked staff for removing the requirement of yearly rabies
and testing because it was difficult to get a cat into a trap a second time as they tended
to be savvy, and pointed out TNR caretakers were doing the work to maintain and reduce
the cat population because cats could get pregnant as early as 3-4 months of age and
likely have three or more litters per year, which was a cycle that continued with each
litter.
Pat Fowler, 606 N. Sixth Street, stated she lived among a cat colony on her street but
did not have problems because the cats had separate territories and respected each
other’s boundaries, noted a former city employee had fostered puppies, which added to
the quality of life of the neighborhood as they were able to interact with them before they
were sent to their forever homes, suggested
a community mediation program for
situations that needed attention, and asked City staff to rethink the regulations regarding
fosters because it was a civic good that was necessary and important to the community.
Renee Carter, a Second Ward resident, wondered how many people would be willing to
foster with a $50 charge and how that would impact the animals, understood fostering
enriched the life of an animal but also was sometimes necessary due to shelter capacity,
thought it was a good idea to discuss the issue of fostering versus having a permanent
pet and being aware of the length of time involved when fostering, and asked why a rabies
vaccination beyond the one time was acceptable.
Tom Rose, a Board of Health (BOH) member, commented that it was important to have at
least one rabies vaccine as it provided a decent amount of immunity versus no immunity,
explained discussing the number of animals was difficult because it was dependent on
whether they were discussing large dogs, such as Great Danes, or cats, and the
restriction of four had been around for decades, stated the goal of the BOH had been to
find a way to allow more animals, which had been discussed without any mention of fees,
felt it was up to the City to determine an appropriate fee amount, noted the BOH had not
considered fostering in those discussions, which again would depend on the type of
animal, i.e., adding two Great Danes to a home with four similar animals already or
adding cats to a home with cats, clarified the BOH discussion regarding feral cats
involved the best way to accommodate public health, and noted the BOH could
re-evaluate specific items, including comparing the pros and cons of a TNR ordinance
with the feral cat ordinance, if desired by the Council.
The Council asked questions and made comments.
Mayor Buffaloe made a motion to withdraw B38-26 with the understanding two
ordinances would come forward in the future, one that had changes to Chapter 5
that did not need another review by the Board of Health, and the other that had
changes to Chapter 5 after further review by the Board of Health based on the