2023 without any code violations, complaints from neighbors, or suggestions that the use
of the properties as short-term rentals had created traffic issues, pointed out the owners
were a local family who were very mindful and responsive and there was nothing in the
UDC that prohibited common management of separate single member LLCs, and believed
this location was appropriate for short-term rentals as indicated by the approval of the one
conditional use permit by the Planning and Zoning Commission.
Peter Norgard, 1602 Hinkson Avenue, pointed out these condos were purpose built for
short-term rentals, believed this was important because the bills that had been previously
presented, including the one that had passed, had all considered short-term rentals as a
commercial use, explained that if the Council allowed for this to move forward in its
entirety, they were saying they would allow commercial uses to occupy residential
zoning districts, and asked the Council to support the Planning and Zoning Commission
recommendation of approval of the one short-term rental while denying the other three.
David Mehr, 714 Ingleside Drive, Chair of the East Campus Neighborhood Association,
explained many of their members were concerned about the issue of placing short-term
rentals within 300 feet of each other as it set a bad precedent, felt it was fine for one unit
to be a short-term rental, and believed the Council should respect the 300-foot limitation
as the previous speaker had very nicely explained.
Cecile Bentley, 1863 Cliff Drive, stated she was surprised at the implication of
neighborhood support being a deciding factor in terms of enforcement of the 300-foot
limitation regarding short-term rentals, felt that was an unlikely perspective for a city to
take in making this type of decision, and felt that type of implication, which was contrary
to the ordinance, would create a dangerous precedent
Dee Dokken, 804 Again Street, commented that she supported the decision of the
Planning and Zoning Commission with regard to this issue as she felt four in a row were
too many, and explained her concern was not associated with the neighborhood or
nuisances, but due to the desire for the availability of long and mid-term rentals.
Nick Timberlake, 5605 Abercorn Drive, stated these units were purpose built 2½ years
ago, understood short-term regulations were being discussed at that time, which was
understandable, explained they had been inspired by great architecture across some of
their travels, wanted to inspire others in Columbia to adopt more unique architecture, and
had given thought to the placement of the homes in an effort to not disrupt a quiet
neighborhood, pointed out the nearby landlords and tenants had commented that they
appreciated them being good neighbors, and noted they wanted to continue serving the
neighborhood and City as well as their guests with short-term rentals by providing a
comfortable and safe place to stay, but would comply with the decision of the Council.
Steve Spellman, 2312 Katy Lane, commented that the use of these properties as
short-term rentals was already occurring, there had not been complaints, and the
property owners were forthcoming in trying to comply with the ordinances, noted he could
sympathize with the neighbors, but the property was near Broadway, and felt this was a
reasonable use that was not a threat to the community as the use was already occurring.
The Council made comments.
B185-25 was given third reading by the City Clerk with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: WATERMAN, PETERS, BUFFALOE, ELWOOD, SAMPLE.
VOTING NO: NO ONE. ABSENT: FOSTER, CARROLL. Bill declared enacted,
reading as follows:
B186-25 was given third reading by the City Clerk with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: WATERMAN. VOTING NO: PETERS, BUFFALOE, ELWOOD,
SAMPLE. ABSENT: FOSTER, CARROLL. Bill declared defeated.
B187-25 was given third reading by the City Clerk with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: WATERMAN. VOTING NO: PETERS, BUFFALOE, ELWOOD,
SAMPLE. ABSENT: FOSTER, CARROLL. Bill declared defeated.
B188-25 was given third reading by the City Clerk with the vote recorded as
follows: VOTING YES: WATERMAN. VOTING NO: PETERS, BUFFALOE, ELWOOD,
SAMPLE. ABSENT: FOSTER, CARROLL. Bill declared defeated.