Kevin Roberson, S. Bennett Drive, who was speaking on behalf of the Friends of Rock
Bridge Memorial State Park, indicated they were against any portion of the trail as they
felt there should be an emphasis on preserving existing natural habitats, especially those
next to parks and conservation areas, and was concerned that a master plan could be
rewritten without much discussion as previous master plans for this area had set aside
the creek and the forested area around the creek as a natural reserve or creek buffer.
Mike Burden, a Fourth Ward resident speaking on behalf of COMO Raptors, stated
support for the project as proposed as it was important to have a trail system that offered
beginner and intermediary options at the same place to allow kids to grow their skills and
make connections with nature in this technologically connected world.
Carter Lembke, a Junior at Hickman High School, stated support of the trail as it
encouraged kids to be outside, which allowed them to understand issues related to
natural areas, such as invasive species.
Kenny Townsend, a NICA parent, spoke in support of the entire trail as he did not feel
kids on bikes did any harm.
David Diamond, a retired University of Missouri ecologist, stated support for the yellow
and green trails, but felt the current plan for the blue trail should be redesigned as it failed
to balance the need for environmental conservation with the need for environmental
opportunities, and thought a suitable compromise could be reached.
Jan Dye, 2222 Bluff Boulevard, indicated she had heard the map was wrong, the buffer
was less than 200 feet from the rookery, and that the rookery was on both sides of Gans
Creek, and suggested time be taken to examine and correct anything needed along with
redesigning of the blue trail so everyone was able to get what they wanted.
Mark Ort, 2601 Lynnwood Drive, stated he appreciated the fact the Gans Creek Wild
Area was being preserved, suggested a larger buffer zone be incorporated into the plans,
and did not feel many people knew about this project as he had only learned of it during
the past couple of months.
Eli Novinger, Snowy Owl Drive, thought it would be beneficial for a 90-day delay to survey
the area in order to ensure the blue heron would remain safe and thriving.
Tehya Ross, a Second Ward resident, suggested a 90-day pause to survey the property
for other options as she did not feel they should put the blue heron at risk when there
were only two nests and believed the trail could be built elsewhere.
Mark Haim, 1402 Richardson Street, speaking on behalf of Mid-Missouri Peaceworks,
was concerned about the potential erosion and damage to the Gans Creek Wild Area,
which was a special place downstream from the proposed blue trail, and suggested time
be taken to take a closer look at that trail project since construction would likely not
occur until next fall.
Mark Gingrich, 407 S. Glenwood Avenue, encouraged the Council to move forward with
the plan as proposed as he felt many were rehashing what the Council had already
approved, i.e., some trail on the south side of the creek, and most of the trail length was
primarily routed on land that was previously a cow pasture and currently used to produce
hay.
Dan Viets, 15 N. Tenth Street, urged the Council to table this item as he did not feel
there was any downside to allowing further discussion on the topic since construction
would not begin until September and because many had not been aware of the issues
surrounding this project until recently.
Sutu Forte stated she felt deceived as It’s Our Wild Nature had not been allowed to
comment and critique this sensitive trail design prior to its approval by the Parks and
Recreation Commission, asked for
a 90-day hiatus to allow them to gather critical
evidence since the construction of this trail would eliminate a natural experience forever,
and indicated she did not feel a compromise at Gans Creek Recreation Area could be
accommodated.
Dorothy Van Black, a Second Ward resident, agreed kids should be more educated on
nature but trails were not needed in order to learn about nature, felt kids should be taught
to maintain creeks versus trails, believed the birds were irreplaceable, and indicated a
90-day delay would allow more people to be educated on the concerns associated with
this project.