September 2023 compared to September 2022. Operating expenses for electric were
down in September 2023 compared to September 2022. In the statement of Revenue,
Expenses, and changes in Retained Earnings, the operating revenue budgets for water
and electric were down compared to last year. The Operating Expenditures budgets for
water and electric were up compared to last year. On the Water Statement, Operating
revenues for residential and commercial sales billed usage was up 5.1%. Operating
expenses for source of supply, power and pumping, and Purification were all up due to
maintenance of wells. On the electric statement, Operating Revenues were down due to a
decrease in MISO transmission revenues. Operating expenses were down for
Production-Operations due to miscellaneous steam power expenses- inventory
adjustment per auditors. Operating expenses for Production-Maintenance were up due to
an increase in IT support compared to 2022. Operating expenses in the other category
were also down due to purchased power: Fiscal Year (FY) 2022 has significantly higher
payments to MISO and SPP for purchase power costs due to higher energy prices,
reliability concerns and weather events. Mr. Switzer reviewed adjustments and suggested
a 4 year plan and waiting for an audit. Ms. Talbert stated the intent was for the end of
January to be the time to send it to Council for any adjustments moved forward. The
inter-office memo was discussed and brought up for specific questions with it being
stated that the water debt coverage ratio was better than last year. The water and electric
utility fund balance sheet was also brought forward for specific questions which there
were none.
VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORT
a) MISO Load Forecast
Ms. Talbert stated that the MISO Load Forecast had been submitted to TEA and advised
the Water and Light Advisory Board (WLAB) to review it and ask questions. It was noted
this report was required each year. Mr. Lucas spoke about the Load Forecast and stated
there were not many changes within. He stated they had adjusted the methodology for
forecasting and that August set an all time peak, which was set for students, with a 9
megawatt (MW) difference in August alone. They(who are they? Staff or WLAB? ) expect
another peak next July of 278.
b) Power Cost Adjustment Report
Ms. Talbert brought to the attention of the board the Power Cost Adjustment Report. She
stated it was a quarterly report and asked if the format was how they wanted it or if it
required changes. It was a summary of the power cost adjustment determination for
October 2023 and was intended to serve as the required quarterly update for the board. It
was broken down into three sections, beginning with Projected expenses. Staff was
forecasting an increase of $2,556,003 in power cost over the current projected FY 2023
level. This was mainly due to transmission and natural gas expenses being lower in FY
2023 than was typical combined with higher than normal transmission revenue. In
Projected Power Cost Recovery, Staff was forecasting an increase in energy sales in
fiscal year 2024 of 39,069,062 Kilowatt hour (kWh). Mild monthly temperatures in both
the winter and summer seasons resulted in lower than typical energy usage in FY 2023.
This corresponded to the forecasted base rate power cost recovery of $68,309,014 in
fiscal year 2024, which was $332,38 less than the current projected power cost
expenses. In spell PCA out here (PCA) Customer Impact, it was a summary of the
PCA’s impact on each customer type through the current month. These impacts were
based on class average monthly usage for the residential, small general service, large