a) Due to an illness in the department, the financial reports were not available.
VI. DIRECTOR'S REPORTS
a) Review Water Irrigation Ordinance
Mrs. Jennifer Coleman led a discussion and review of the water irrigation ordinance
draft. The board and staff reviewed the draft ordinance point by point, asked
clarifying questions, and made adjustments. Mr. David Switzer mentioned the
concern that was expressed by the public regarding the irrigation of City-owned land
and golf courses. Mrs. Erin Keys will get clarification from Parks and Recreation
regarding their watering practices. Mrs. Jennifer Coleman recommended increasing
the fine for violating the ordinance.
b) Transmission Line Cost Estimate
Mrs. Erin Keys provided the cost estimates for the transmission line. The Chapel Hill
Route assumes 11 months of construction and has an estimated total of $43,056,144.
The Vawter School Route assumes 8 months of construction and has an estimated
total of $29,987,013. The remaining bond authority is $29,885,000. The Vawter
School Route goes from Chapel Hill Rd down Scott Blvd then across Vawter School,
Grindstone to the Grindstone Substation. The Chapel Hill Route goes down Chapel
Hill through backyards across Forum and the existing69kV route. This does not
include a substation at Mill Creek. To make the transmission line underground, the
totals would increase by 3-5 times the estimate provided. This cost estimate was
provided to the board to allow them the opportunity to review it before it goes to City
Council.
c) Purchase Power Agreement Review
Mrs. Erin Keys presented 3 solar proposals in MISO Zone 5. They all score similarly
in metrics. Two proposals connect to substations in MISO Zone 5; one is 20
megawatts and the other is 40 megawatts. The third proposal is for 140 megawatts
and would connect directly to Bolstad, and it’s a surplus generation proposal. All
three proposals are in the 62-72 dollars per megawatt hour range. The impact on
annual operating expenses would range from 2-12%, with the largest proposal being
on the higher end of the impact. The contract length for the 20 and 40 megawatt
proposals is 8-12 years and the 140 megawatt proposal is a 20 year contract. After
discussing the proposals, Mrs. Jennifer Coleman stated the board is not in favor of
moving forward with this project based on the financials; if Council is insistent on a
project, then the project that would put the least amount of risk on the utility would be
the 20 megawatt, 8-12 year contract.
d) Monthly Power Cost Adjustment (PCA) Report
Due to time constraints, this agenda item has been pushed to the next meeting date.
e) Quarterly Utility Disconnection Update
Due to time constraints, this agenda item has been pushed to the next meeting date.