with the current definition of “family” within the UDC and felt that STR occupancy
should match the occupancy limits current established for long-term rentals within
specific zoning districts.
Proposed use-specific standard B (11) [Separation] was initially approved (7-0);
however, prior to the end of work session was reconsidered after additional
discussion regarding its possible application and impacts resulting in a second tie
vote of (3-3) meaning no recommendation was made on the provision. It was
agreed the Commission would come back to the provision for further discussion at
a future work session meeting.
Proposed use-specific standard B (12) [Certificate of Compliance posting] was
approved as written and was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote
of (7-0).
Proposed use-specific standard B (14) [ADU usage] was approved as written and
was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (7-0). There was
significant discussion relating to how an ADU would be allowed to be used;
however, once all issues were debated it was agreed that that the current
regulatory process to establish an ADU would provide sufficient oversight
especially given an ADU in an R-1 zoning district is a conditional use already. The
Commission also noted that given only one dwelling on a property could be used
for STR purposes regardless of the rental status of other structures on the property
the impacts were minimized.
Proposed use-specific standard B (16) [Compliance] was approved as written and
was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (8-0). There was
discussion on the length of time that was being allotted for a property to be
brought into compliance and concerns were expressed that 180 days may be
insufficient. In efforts to maintain forward momentum with the remaining
regulations, the Commission agreed to support the standard as presented but
indicated that it may circle back to discuss again in a future meeting.
Proposed use-specific standard B (4) [Conditional use permit] was approved as
written and was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (7-0).
Proposed use-specific standard B (7) [Accessibility] was approved as written and
was agreed upon to be applicable to only Tier 3 by a vote of (6-0). This applicability
of the provision was questioned by several Commissioners and it was asked if it
was specifically necessary. Commissioner Loe addressed way she felt the provision
was needed and cited the fact that it served an “advisory” function. Under certain
situations the provision of accessibility would be trigger if a structure were
converted from a primary residence to one more commercially used. There was
further Commission discussion on the provision after which it was agreed to be
included in the draft regulations.
Proposed use-specific standard B (5) [Multi-family Structure Usage] was removed
from the proposed regulations by a vote of (7-0). There was significant discussion
regarding this provision which principally focused on the necessity of it given the
proposed licensure standards. Concerns were expressed that it created
unnecessary confusion. Given the concerns expressed it was agreed that the
provisions were not necessary.
Proposed zoning district accommodation within the Permitted Use Table to allow
and STR in the A (Agriculture) district was approved to be applicable to only Tiers 1
or 2 STRs by a vote of (7-0). Commissioner Loe noted that as she had been
reviewing the permitted use table that it appeared the A (Agriculture) district had