City of Columbia, Missouri  
Meeting Minutes  
Planning and Zoning Commission  
Conference Rooms  
1A/1B  
Tuesday, November 29, 2022  
6:00 PM  
Special Call Work Session  
Columbia City Hall  
701 E. Broadway  
I. CALL TO ORDER  
7 -  
Present:  
Tootie Burns, Sara Loe, Michael MacMann, Valerie Carroll, Sharon Geuea Jones,  
Peggy Placier and Shannon Wilson  
2 - Anthony Stanton and Robbin Kimbell  
Excused:  
II. INTRODUCTIONS  
III. APPROVAL OF AGENDA  
Move to approve  
IV. OLD BUSINESS  
A. Draft Regulations - Short-term Rental (continued)  
Mr. Zenner provided a brief overview of the meeting agenda and possible  
outcomes before handing the meeting over to Chair Geuea Jones who explained  
the general format and contents of the City Council work session memo that would  
be prepared. In response to Chair Geuea Jones proposed content, Commissioner  
Placier offer a recommendation that the preface of the memo should address why  
short-term regulations were being prepared. There was additional discussion  
regarding the memo content with an understanding that a more refined version  
would be presented prior to the December 8 PZC work session for the full  
Commission’s consideration.  
Having address the Council memo outline and possible content, Mr. Zenner noted  
that Chair Geuea Jones had prepared a proposed outline for moving forward with  
the review of the outstanding draft provisions that had yet to be voted upon by the  
Commission. Chair Geuea Jones spoke briefly regarding the outlined and sought  
any additional input relating to an alternative approach to work through the  
remaining issues/provisions. She noted that the outline generally moved from  
“least” controversial topics to “most” controversial such that meaningful progress  
could be achieved at each of next three special work session. There was hope that  
at least one meet could be eliminated.  
No alternative recommendations were offered by the Commission to approach the  
outstanding issues/provisions. As such, the Commission proceeded to discuss each  
topic as shown on the outline and voted. The following were the result of the  
voting on each of the provisions.  
Proposed use-specific standard B (5) [Maximum occupancy] was approved as  
written and was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (6-1). The  
dissenting vote expressed concern that the maximum occupancy was not consistent  
with the current definition of “family” within the UDC and felt that STR occupancy  
should match the occupancy limits current established for long-term rentals within  
specific zoning districts.  
Proposed use-specific standard B (11) [Separation] was initially approved (7-0);  
however, prior to the end of work session was reconsidered after additional  
discussion regarding its possible application and impacts resulting in a second tie  
vote of (3-3) meaning no recommendation was made on the provision. It was  
agreed the Commission would come back to the provision for further discussion at  
a future work session meeting.  
Proposed use-specific standard B (12) [Certificate of Compliance posting] was  
approved as written and was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote  
of (7-0).  
Proposed use-specific standard B (14) [ADU usage] was approved as written and  
was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (7-0). There was  
significant discussion relating to how an ADU would be allowed to be used;  
however, once all issues were debated it was agreed that that the current  
regulatory process to establish an ADU would provide sufficient oversight  
especially given an ADU in an R-1 zoning district is a conditional use already. The  
Commission also noted that given only one dwelling on a property could be used  
for STR purposes regardless of the rental status of other structures on the property  
the impacts were minimized.  
Proposed use-specific standard B (16) [Compliance] was approved as written and  
was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (8-0). There was  
discussion on the length of time that was being allotted for a property to be  
brought into compliance and concerns were expressed that 180 days may be  
insufficient. In efforts to maintain forward momentum with the remaining  
regulations, the Commission agreed to support the standard as presented but  
indicated that it may circle back to discuss again in a future meeting.  
Proposed use-specific standard B (4) [Conditional use permit] was approved as  
written and was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (7-0).  
Proposed use-specific standard B (7) [Accessibility] was approved as written and  
was agreed upon to be applicable to only Tier 3 by a vote of (6-0). This applicability  
of the provision was questioned by several Commissioners and it was asked if it  
was specifically necessary. Commissioner Loe addressed way she felt the provision  
was needed and cited the fact that it served an “advisory” function. Under certain  
situations the provision of accessibility would be trigger if a structure were  
converted from a primary residence to one more commercially used. There was  
further Commission discussion on the provision after which it was agreed to be  
included in the draft regulations.  
Proposed use-specific standard B (5) [Multi-family Structure Usage] was removed  
from the proposed regulations by a vote of (7-0). There was significant discussion  
regarding this provision which principally focused on the necessity of it given the  
proposed licensure standards. Concerns were expressed that it created  
unnecessary confusion. Given the concerns expressed it was agreed that the  
provisions were not necessary.  
Proposed zoning district accommodation within the Permitted Use Table to allow  
and STR in the A (Agriculture) district was approved to be applicable to only Tiers 1  
or 2 STRs by a vote of (7-0). Commissioner Loe noted that as she had been  
reviewing the permitted use table that it appeared the A (Agriculture) district had  
been omitted as a permissible location for a Tier 1 or 2 STR. The A district allows  
residential dwellings; therefore, it was believed to that a Tier 1 or 2 STR should be  
allowed. Commissioner agreed that the omission should be corrected.  
Proposed use-specific standard B (8) [Reservations] was approved as written and  
was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (6-0).  
Proposed use-specific standard B (9) [Dwelling Unit Usage] was approved as  
written and was agreed upon to be applicable to all STR tiers by a vote of (6-0).  
Having arrived at approximately 8:30 the Commission agreed that they had made  
sufficient progress for the work session and agreed to adjourn for the evening. The  
Commission noted that they would resume their discussion of the outstanding STR  
regulatory provisions on November 30 at 6 pm.  
V. NEXT MEETING DATE - November 30, 202 @ 6 pm  
VI. ADJOURNMENT  
Meeting adjourned at approximately 8:30 pm  
Move to adjourn