to that 44 -- or excuse me -- that 45-foot height. We're much less than that in an area
that has quite a few taller buildings. We've got the three-story hotel, we've got a six- or
seven-story hotel, and some other larger buildings out there, as well. So, you know, you
kind of see the location here. Here's the zoning map. Obviously, we're not adjacent to
any residential zoning, so we feel, you know, very -- you know, protected by that. Mr.
Palmer indicated that we won't see the building from the adjacent right-of-way, and he
had a schematic that kind of showed where the location of the building would be, but his
schematic kind of showed that on the front side of the trees. There is a tree line between
us and I-70 there. So here's our location. You can see that the building itself is going to
be shielded, for the most part, by -- from the hotel. The hotel is going to screen us from
adjacent right-of-ways. Yes, it is adjacent to the hotel itself. The larger grocer to the
west is there and, of course, our existing facility further east. Scanning out just a little
bit, you can see all the other commercial developments in the area, so we feel that it's in
character with what's already out there. Again, you've seen these depictions. Again, it
walks out from one side to the other, from 23 to 33 feet in height. Another depiction
there. The green arrow points to where our building is going to be located, so you can
see that it's behind the hotel, screened from view. Here's the -- on Keene Street. It's --
again, you can see it's screened. We've got trees that will give it some buffer, as well as
the existing buildings. Use specific standards, I think Mr. Palmer went through all those.
I'm happy to answer any questions with regards to those. I believe we are in
conformance with those. This project has been tabled several times. It started back in
December, the first time it had come before this Commission in December; however, it
was tabled for the purpose of going back and making revisions and working with City staff
to come up with a plan that had those different building materials in the locations that
might be visible from the public view, and so that was the reason for the tabling. We have
been working with staff for some time now to get those standards -- get those revisions
made so we can be in conformance with those standards. So again, you know, we
believe it's consistent with the allowed uses with existing zoning. It's consistent with the
specified use standards, promotes an increase in density around an already existing
infrastructure, the infrastructure is there for it. It's compatible and it comes to you with
support from City staff. So with that, I'm happy to answer any questions that the
Commission may have.
MS. GEUEA JONES: Are there any questions for this speaker? Seeing none. I
have a quick question. So you're putting tiny bits of brick on here, but the rest of it is still
sheet metal?
MR. CROCKETT: Yes. That's basically the plan, yes, ma'am. Because it doesn't
have any, really, view from any -- any adjacent areas. It's kind of secluded back in the
back corner of the existing site. The metal is going to match the existing facility, the
